Let's talk about this approach I refer to as "Homestead Beekeeping". I use this term in contrast to "Conventional Beekeeping or "Commercial Beekeeping".
Let's keep facts up front shall we? Both commercial beekeeping and conventional beekeeping are approaches of beekeeping that focus on beekeepers working hives to maximize honey production in the best interest of the beekeeper.
Conventional beekeeping is, the way I refer to it, using the same equipment, management techniques and prioritization of beekeeper intent over bee intent, just on a smaller and generally more localized scale.
Homestead Beekeepers also want to harvest product from the hives. However, the motive isn't for profit necessarily as it is to contribute to the beekeeper's ability to be self sufficient. Not to say that every hobbyist that follows conventional beekeeping is in it for profit, but that the practices they use and the view they take to beekeeping is essentially the same as commercial beekeeping.
No, I'm not calling these people bad people or bad beekeepers. I'm just saying that a homestead beekeeper has a bit of a different set of priorities and outlook toward the bees.
Homesteading in general is an approach to life that is centered around a person being self sufficient. The self sufficient person is looking for ways to provide for their lifestyle that is not dependent on the surrounding social system. They prefer to make and grow and do things themselves to have more control over the process and to use the harvested items in their everyday life.
Homesteaders grow fruits and vegetables. We raise livestock for food and materials. Homesteaders try to be as efficient as possible, getting the most out of our efforts as possible and be as resourceful as possible. We also have a healthy respect for those animals and creatures we include in our efforts.
When it comes to honey bees, we want to not only get the surplus honey, but the extra wax as well. We want the surplus pollen and the extra propolis. We also want the pollination for our gardens and fruit trees. We want to be able to harvest over the long term as much as possible meaning we look out for the welfare of the bees above all.
We have a lot of respect for the bees as being very self sufficient themselves. They are a role model and example of this worthwhile lifestyle. Bees do not "need" people to survive. They have adapted with flowers over 150 million years. They are actually very able to over produce to meet their own needs and tolerate harvesting of their surplus resources very well all things considered.
What the Homestead beekeeper understands is that the bees don't need us to do it for them. They need us to generally stay out of their way and be a good neighbor to them. The need us to plant lots of flowers all year long. this benefits them as well as it benefits us.
They need us to stay out of the hive unless it's absolutely necessary. Whether it is harvest time or because we observe a problem when we inspect the external area of the hive, they will let us know when they need someones attention and assistance to overcome problems they cannot handle themselves.
We as Homestead beekeepers learn the signs of a hive in distress simply by paying attention to the external environment of the hive. We study honey bee biology and natural behavior to identify and differentiate between a healthy colony and one that needs help.
Homestead beekeepers tend to use hives and methods that allow the best of both worlds, as we see it. We use top bar hives or even framed hive setups that allow harvesting of honey and wax combs. This gives us more of those items and it gives the bees fresh, unpolluted wax to raise their brood in each new Spring. Because we take combs and all, we are very, very careful not to take too much or leave the bees with too little. In fact, a Homestead beekeeper will be more likely to leave a little more just to ensure the bees have enough for Winter.
We try to use hives that meet the ideals that scout bees look for for when swarms leave a hive in their annual reproduction of the colony. We look for hives that have similar dimensions and attributes that are sought out by swarms. In other words, we want to encourage the bees to live "naturally" or as they would outside of human management.
Why do Homestead beekeepers want to keep bees in this manner? Because we have a great respect for our bees and e want to promote long term health and prosperity for our bees. The longer our bees stay healthy and prosperous, the longer we can continue to harvest their surplus and be self sufficient on our own.
Wednesday, July 23, 2014
Sunday, July 13, 2014
More Than One Way To Play With Bees
Ever since Lorenzo Langstroth introduced his hive system, American beekeepers have overwhelmingly used and taught one main way to go about beekeeping. That approach to beekeeping is essentially the same model regardless the size of the operation by a beekeeper. Hobbyists, Sideliners and Commercial beekeepers alike essentially use the same approach to beekeeping regardless.
I would suggest though, that modern beekeepers should consider another beekeeping approach. An approach that is not new or dramatically different from anything that has been done in the past. Simply an outlook that has been overlooked for at least a hundred years or longer.
First of all, the modern, conventional approach is the Commercial approach. Nearly all beekeeping in America is done with an eye on surplus honey production. I'm not saying that this is bad or wrong in and of itself. I am suggesting though that it may not be the best approach for every beekeeper and possibly for most hobbyists.
In the conventional commercial approach, hive bodies are supered, meaning that new boxes are added tot he hive stack on top of the current boxes.This is done because beekeepers know that bees prefer to store honey above the brood and so by adding more space above the bees, the bees will most likely fill that excess space with honey.
What I would propose might be a better approach for beekeepers with smaller interests is what I refer to as the Homestead approach to beekeeping.
The Homestead approach focuses more on collecting resources from the whole hive instead of just one primary crop like honey. The Homestead approach seeks to collect honey, beeswax, propolis and even pollen from the hive not so much to sell to others but as a way of being self sufficient in one's own home.
As a result of this smaller scale of beekeeping, a Homestead beekeeper is looking to minimize interaction with the colony beyond harvest. This doesn't mean the Homestead beekeeper doesn't inspect hives or take measures to help hives stay healthy. It just means the beekeeper is going about managing the bees differently from a high honey crop production approach.
I think we can see the interest in many newer beekeepers in looking for another approach to beekeeping that is outside of the conventional approach. A great interest in top bar beekeeping and other types of hives and methods has become obvious in beekeeping magazines, beekeeping club meetings and presentations and in other ways.
In future posts, I will elaborate on how I see Homestead Beekeeping as an alternative approach to beekeeping and how it can successfully be done.
I would suggest though, that modern beekeepers should consider another beekeeping approach. An approach that is not new or dramatically different from anything that has been done in the past. Simply an outlook that has been overlooked for at least a hundred years or longer.
First of all, the modern, conventional approach is the Commercial approach. Nearly all beekeeping in America is done with an eye on surplus honey production. I'm not saying that this is bad or wrong in and of itself. I am suggesting though that it may not be the best approach for every beekeeper and possibly for most hobbyists.
In the conventional commercial approach, hive bodies are supered, meaning that new boxes are added tot he hive stack on top of the current boxes.This is done because beekeepers know that bees prefer to store honey above the brood and so by adding more space above the bees, the bees will most likely fill that excess space with honey.
What I would propose might be a better approach for beekeepers with smaller interests is what I refer to as the Homestead approach to beekeeping.
The Homestead approach focuses more on collecting resources from the whole hive instead of just one primary crop like honey. The Homestead approach seeks to collect honey, beeswax, propolis and even pollen from the hive not so much to sell to others but as a way of being self sufficient in one's own home.
As a result of this smaller scale of beekeeping, a Homestead beekeeper is looking to minimize interaction with the colony beyond harvest. This doesn't mean the Homestead beekeeper doesn't inspect hives or take measures to help hives stay healthy. It just means the beekeeper is going about managing the bees differently from a high honey crop production approach.
I think we can see the interest in many newer beekeepers in looking for another approach to beekeeping that is outside of the conventional approach. A great interest in top bar beekeeping and other types of hives and methods has become obvious in beekeeping magazines, beekeeping club meetings and presentations and in other ways.
In future posts, I will elaborate on how I see Homestead Beekeeping as an alternative approach to beekeeping and how it can successfully be done.
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
What's In Your Spray Bottle?
I can tell you that in mine you'll find Honey-B-Healthy.
I "discovered" HBH about two years ago. At the time I was just wanting to try it out as a stimulant for Spring rearing by mixing it it with 1:1 sugar syrup.
At this point, I cannot see being a beekeeper without it. It helps with so much more than that.
Mind you, this is all circumstantial evidence, but hey, I believe what I see with my own eyes.
Here are things that I do with HBH that help my beekeeping;
1) Stimulate brood rearing as a feed additive.
2) Spray directly onto queens (usually HBH mixed with water or even not mixed at all) when they are introduced into a colony as a replacement. The bees just seemingly automatically and unquestioningly accept her even without spending time in a cage.
3) Mix with water to use instead of a smoker. This seems especially useful when dealing with swarms, cut outs and trap outs. Spray the bees a bit if they are flying a bit too much or they seem a little too grouchy. Takes most of the grouchy right outta them.
4) Spray onto frames or foundation to encourage bees to draw wax there. This seems to especially work well when used as a mix of 1:1 sugar syrup with HBH. I have been using leftover black plastic foundation that I noticed bees have been reluctant to draw out in the past. I had a need for the foundation recently and thought it might be interesting to see if the HBH would help that out any.
WOW, did itever! On average, I have found that bees will draw out frames sprayed with HBH almost completely within 5 days and often sooner.
I still use a smoker on hive inspections, but boy is that spray bottle with HBH handy for working with bees outside of a typical hive inspection scenario.
I "discovered" HBH about two years ago. At the time I was just wanting to try it out as a stimulant for Spring rearing by mixing it it with 1:1 sugar syrup.
At this point, I cannot see being a beekeeper without it. It helps with so much more than that.
Mind you, this is all circumstantial evidence, but hey, I believe what I see with my own eyes.
Here are things that I do with HBH that help my beekeeping;
1) Stimulate brood rearing as a feed additive.
2) Spray directly onto queens (usually HBH mixed with water or even not mixed at all) when they are introduced into a colony as a replacement. The bees just seemingly automatically and unquestioningly accept her even without spending time in a cage.
3) Mix with water to use instead of a smoker. This seems especially useful when dealing with swarms, cut outs and trap outs. Spray the bees a bit if they are flying a bit too much or they seem a little too grouchy. Takes most of the grouchy right outta them.
4) Spray onto frames or foundation to encourage bees to draw wax there. This seems to especially work well when used as a mix of 1:1 sugar syrup with HBH. I have been using leftover black plastic foundation that I noticed bees have been reluctant to draw out in the past. I had a need for the foundation recently and thought it might be interesting to see if the HBH would help that out any.
WOW, did itever! On average, I have found that bees will draw out frames sprayed with HBH almost completely within 5 days and often sooner.
I still use a smoker on hive inspections, but boy is that spray bottle with HBH handy for working with bees outside of a typical hive inspection scenario.
Sunday, June 8, 2014
Urban Beekeeping: Rule 1; Bee A Good Neighbor
With the increase in urban beekeeping one of the things I get asked about a lot as President of the Omaha Bee Club is "What is different between beekeeping in the city vs beekeeping in the country?"
Urban beekeeping is indeed increasing and it's exciting and full of potential. At the same time, it persents problems that don't exist or aren't pressented the same way in country beekeeping.
Urban beekeeping requires us to think more about our neighbors and the neighborhood we have our bees in. Country beekeepers might not have neighbors within a half mile to a mile or even further from them.
The first rule of urban beekeeping, I tell people, is to bee a good neighbor. This means, don't let your beekeeping become someone else's problem.
Make sure to provide a good water source for your bees so that they don't take over your neighbors swimming pools or bird baths.
Your bees will swarm. Plan on it. Try to prevent it if you feel you can or must and be prepared to set out strategically placed bait hives to hopefully catch any swarms that get away. Your neighbors might think it's cool and wonderful that you're keeping bees, but they don't want your swarms moving into their eaves, roofs, walls and sheds or garages.
Some people have an irrational or ignorant fear of bees. While the idea of a 6 foot tall, 250 pound construction worker being afraid of some little bees might amuse you or even annoy you, remember that in "normal" society, beekeepers are the weird people. Try to keep in mind that these people can be your greatest ally or they can be the biggest thorn in your side. Try to educate them on how your bees are pollinating their gardens, fruit trees and ornamental flowers. This gives them bigger and more fruits, vegetables and blooms. Maybe drop a small jar of honey on them once a year, let them get them hooked on the good stuff. Whatever you do, don't antagonize your neighbors (at least, not unnecessarily). You, whether you like it or not, are representing all other beekeepers, why make it harder for the rest of us?
Keep your bees happy. Now we as beekeepers know that some colonies are more grumpy than others, especially as people get closer to the hive. Keeping our bees more docile by not unnecessarily riling them up and paying attention to the bees environment by keeping certain predators like skunks, racoons and others away so as not to get them aggressive all the time. This will help in not having people complain that you have "mean" bees.
In times of dearth, when the temperatures and weather conditions keep flowers from blooming and not much is available in terms of forage, you can put out sugar syrup feeders (try to keep them more than 75 feet away from the hives to prevent robbing). By putting syrup out for them in your own yard, you can minimize how much they go out to investigate neighbors trash and picnics. Some beekeepers will use in hive frame feeders at these times to help keep bees in food stores during a dearth. Keep in mind that if you use outdoor feeder pails with sugar syrup during these times, you will likely get a lot of other visitors to the pails as well like Yellow Jackets and Wasps.
To be a happy urban beekeeper means keeping your neighbors happy or at least tolerant. You can go a long way by beeing a good neighbor.
Urban beekeeping is indeed increasing and it's exciting and full of potential. At the same time, it persents problems that don't exist or aren't pressented the same way in country beekeeping.
Urban beekeeping requires us to think more about our neighbors and the neighborhood we have our bees in. Country beekeepers might not have neighbors within a half mile to a mile or even further from them.
The first rule of urban beekeeping, I tell people, is to bee a good neighbor. This means, don't let your beekeeping become someone else's problem.
Make sure to provide a good water source for your bees so that they don't take over your neighbors swimming pools or bird baths.
Your bees will swarm. Plan on it. Try to prevent it if you feel you can or must and be prepared to set out strategically placed bait hives to hopefully catch any swarms that get away. Your neighbors might think it's cool and wonderful that you're keeping bees, but they don't want your swarms moving into their eaves, roofs, walls and sheds or garages.
Some people have an irrational or ignorant fear of bees. While the idea of a 6 foot tall, 250 pound construction worker being afraid of some little bees might amuse you or even annoy you, remember that in "normal" society, beekeepers are the weird people. Try to keep in mind that these people can be your greatest ally or they can be the biggest thorn in your side. Try to educate them on how your bees are pollinating their gardens, fruit trees and ornamental flowers. This gives them bigger and more fruits, vegetables and blooms. Maybe drop a small jar of honey on them once a year, let them get them hooked on the good stuff. Whatever you do, don't antagonize your neighbors (at least, not unnecessarily). You, whether you like it or not, are representing all other beekeepers, why make it harder for the rest of us?
Keep your bees happy. Now we as beekeepers know that some colonies are more grumpy than others, especially as people get closer to the hive. Keeping our bees more docile by not unnecessarily riling them up and paying attention to the bees environment by keeping certain predators like skunks, racoons and others away so as not to get them aggressive all the time. This will help in not having people complain that you have "mean" bees.
In times of dearth, when the temperatures and weather conditions keep flowers from blooming and not much is available in terms of forage, you can put out sugar syrup feeders (try to keep them more than 75 feet away from the hives to prevent robbing). By putting syrup out for them in your own yard, you can minimize how much they go out to investigate neighbors trash and picnics. Some beekeepers will use in hive frame feeders at these times to help keep bees in food stores during a dearth. Keep in mind that if you use outdoor feeder pails with sugar syrup during these times, you will likely get a lot of other visitors to the pails as well like Yellow Jackets and Wasps.
To be a happy urban beekeeper means keeping your neighbors happy or at least tolerant. You can go a long way by beeing a good neighbor.
Monday, June 2, 2014
Spring Management of my Modified Warre Style Hive
I've mentioned before that my hives are sorta, kinda Warre-ish types of hives.
I use 5 frame Lang boxes and frames. Custom built bottoms, tops and quilt boxes. I nadir all the boxes according to Warre's method and I only harvest the boxes above the bottom two in the stack as they are the brood and winter stores boxes. The entrances are about 3/8" high by 7 1/2" long at the bottom board.
I don't recall if I ever discussed this particular hive with you but I meant to (and I might have somewhere but I don't remember) and so I will recap it's beginning and then get to where things are now.
This hive started April 28th with a "Baby Nuc" or a 3 frame nuc with a queen which was "salvaged" from another colony that had been re-queened because the owner insisted on a new queen even though this queen was still doing just fine.
I started them in a single deep 5 frame box placing the 3 frames in the center of the hive in frame spaces 2, 3, and 4 with foundation-less frames on each side in spaces 1 and 5.
A second box was added to the stack underneath the first box (nadiring) one week later. That box had 1 frame with black plastic foundation in the center at frame space 3 with foundation-less frames surrounding it in spaces 1,2, 4, and 5. This is the "default" new box for every hive I run.
The two box stack was then moved to it's permanent location about three days after adding the second box and has been in place there, un-opened and un-inspected since then. Based on recent bee yard visits/external inspections I determined last week that the time was coming to add a third box to the stack based on activity at the entrance of the hive.
This week, today actually, the third box was added to the bottom of the stack with the same setup as described above. No smoke was used and the bees were not aggressive or feisty but did exhibit some defensive behavior which is to be expected. Of the two of us there, no one was stung.
Next week there will be a full inspection of the hive. Inspections are scheduled to occur at about every 4 weeks or once a month. The hive is visited weekly with observation and environmental checks to ascertain that the hive is not in need of immediate inspection.
The goal is to minimize intrusion in the nest and disrupting the inner environment such as nest scent and heat.
I'l post again after the inspection and go over how I do inspections and what I look for.
I use 5 frame Lang boxes and frames. Custom built bottoms, tops and quilt boxes. I nadir all the boxes according to Warre's method and I only harvest the boxes above the bottom two in the stack as they are the brood and winter stores boxes. The entrances are about 3/8" high by 7 1/2" long at the bottom board.
I don't recall if I ever discussed this particular hive with you but I meant to (and I might have somewhere but I don't remember) and so I will recap it's beginning and then get to where things are now.
This hive started April 28th with a "Baby Nuc" or a 3 frame nuc with a queen which was "salvaged" from another colony that had been re-queened because the owner insisted on a new queen even though this queen was still doing just fine.
I started them in a single deep 5 frame box placing the 3 frames in the center of the hive in frame spaces 2, 3, and 4 with foundation-less frames on each side in spaces 1 and 5.
A second box was added to the stack underneath the first box (nadiring) one week later. That box had 1 frame with black plastic foundation in the center at frame space 3 with foundation-less frames surrounding it in spaces 1,2, 4, and 5. This is the "default" new box for every hive I run.
The two box stack was then moved to it's permanent location about three days after adding the second box and has been in place there, un-opened and un-inspected since then. Based on recent bee yard visits/external inspections I determined last week that the time was coming to add a third box to the stack based on activity at the entrance of the hive.
This week, today actually, the third box was added to the bottom of the stack with the same setup as described above. No smoke was used and the bees were not aggressive or feisty but did exhibit some defensive behavior which is to be expected. Of the two of us there, no one was stung.
Next week there will be a full inspection of the hive. Inspections are scheduled to occur at about every 4 weeks or once a month. The hive is visited weekly with observation and environmental checks to ascertain that the hive is not in need of immediate inspection.
The goal is to minimize intrusion in the nest and disrupting the inner environment such as nest scent and heat.
I'l post again after the inspection and go over how I do inspections and what I look for.
Saturday, May 31, 2014
How Do People Treat Bees
There are two kinds of "treating" most folks associate with beekeeping. "Treating" such as a "treatment" for an issue or concern such as using Apistan or something to deal with a colony health or pest issue. Then there is "treating" as in, "I treat my bees like ranchers treat cattle".
I want to touch on the second type of treating here.
I hear the approach of treating and thinking of bees as a domesticated animal like cattle, sheep, pigs, etc... a lot. A domesticated animal cannot survive on it's own or is dramatically reduced in it's ability to survive on it's own outside of human care and management. The example often given is that if a domesticated animal were to "run away" from it's managed care and wander into a place where it had to survive on it's own, The odds are it would soon perish due to not being adapted to foraging, hunting, defending, for itself.
The equivalent of bees "running away" is what is called "absconding" where the colony decides that something is wrong or insufficient in the current hive and decide to relocate to another location to start over.
Everything they need to know how and be able to do, they can do. They do not need humans for food or shelter. They are not limited in continuing their existing away from us. The only things that limit them would limit them no matter where they made a home and those are primarily genetic traits that exited before they got to us.
Randy Oliver recently had an article in American Bee Journal talking about how bees bred by man for specific traits can be or should be considered domesticated. On one hand, I can see what he means by thinking of these bees bred to show very specific traits of docility, high brood and honey production as domesticated.
I think he is correct in thinking that bees specifically bred to such traits can use all the help they can get from beekeepers, they aren't exactly unable to swarm or abscond and potentially survive in feral conditions either. The odds of success are lowered but they are there enough to give them a higher chance than a cow or a sheep or another "domesticated" animal might ever have.
What I think is a problem is that many beekeepers only or primarily see bees as a commodity. Something to be bought or sold for profit. If they (the bees) aren't performing the way the beekeeper expects, the bees are seen as as liability and sold or even exterminated to reduce losses.
The primary view of these types of beekeepers is that the value of the bees is tied to those bees ability to produce and the investment the beekeeper has in them. These beekeepers seem more often to be willing to use chemical treatments inside a hive even if all the potential effects are unknown or possibly hazardous in order to preserve their investment.
A counter perspective would be to look at the bees as independent creatures who have certain needs in which a trade agreement is arragned.
I provide these creatures a hive to build their nest in and because I know they will over-produce with more space available, I take rent in the form of honey and wax. Never taking so much that I should leave them without enough for their needs. Maybe it could be better seen as working with a neighbor cooperatively in a garden. I have plenty of space available and they are the experienced honey maker who does the lions share of the labor to grow the garden. I step in to help with the harvest, taking some for me and making sure not to take from their stockpile.
We can look at bees as neighbors and like any human neighbor, most beekeepers have a "good neighbor" outlook that encourages us to help out our neighbors in times of need. We are more than glad to provide some sugar if they need it. Often we help our neighbors who have fallen on hard times or are afflicted by circumstances beyond their control such as dearth and drought, storms and disability.
The point is to be ready to help out these buzzing little neighbors without intruding or stepping on their integrity and self sufficiency. They know what they need and want, If they are of good stock, they will withstand most problems on their own with minimal assistance from their neighborly beekeeper.
How do we treat our bees? Do we treat them like property, having no independence beyond our intentions or do we see them as capable living creatures that we can share a cooperative existence with?
I want to touch on the second type of treating here.
I hear the approach of treating and thinking of bees as a domesticated animal like cattle, sheep, pigs, etc... a lot. A domesticated animal cannot survive on it's own or is dramatically reduced in it's ability to survive on it's own outside of human care and management. The example often given is that if a domesticated animal were to "run away" from it's managed care and wander into a place where it had to survive on it's own, The odds are it would soon perish due to not being adapted to foraging, hunting, defending, for itself.
The equivalent of bees "running away" is what is called "absconding" where the colony decides that something is wrong or insufficient in the current hive and decide to relocate to another location to start over.
Everything they need to know how and be able to do, they can do. They do not need humans for food or shelter. They are not limited in continuing their existing away from us. The only things that limit them would limit them no matter where they made a home and those are primarily genetic traits that exited before they got to us.
Randy Oliver recently had an article in American Bee Journal talking about how bees bred by man for specific traits can be or should be considered domesticated. On one hand, I can see what he means by thinking of these bees bred to show very specific traits of docility, high brood and honey production as domesticated.
I think he is correct in thinking that bees specifically bred to such traits can use all the help they can get from beekeepers, they aren't exactly unable to swarm or abscond and potentially survive in feral conditions either. The odds of success are lowered but they are there enough to give them a higher chance than a cow or a sheep or another "domesticated" animal might ever have.
What I think is a problem is that many beekeepers only or primarily see bees as a commodity. Something to be bought or sold for profit. If they (the bees) aren't performing the way the beekeeper expects, the bees are seen as as liability and sold or even exterminated to reduce losses.
The primary view of these types of beekeepers is that the value of the bees is tied to those bees ability to produce and the investment the beekeeper has in them. These beekeepers seem more often to be willing to use chemical treatments inside a hive even if all the potential effects are unknown or possibly hazardous in order to preserve their investment.
A counter perspective would be to look at the bees as independent creatures who have certain needs in which a trade agreement is arragned.
I provide these creatures a hive to build their nest in and because I know they will over-produce with more space available, I take rent in the form of honey and wax. Never taking so much that I should leave them without enough for their needs. Maybe it could be better seen as working with a neighbor cooperatively in a garden. I have plenty of space available and they are the experienced honey maker who does the lions share of the labor to grow the garden. I step in to help with the harvest, taking some for me and making sure not to take from their stockpile.
We can look at bees as neighbors and like any human neighbor, most beekeepers have a "good neighbor" outlook that encourages us to help out our neighbors in times of need. We are more than glad to provide some sugar if they need it. Often we help our neighbors who have fallen on hard times or are afflicted by circumstances beyond their control such as dearth and drought, storms and disability.
The point is to be ready to help out these buzzing little neighbors without intruding or stepping on their integrity and self sufficiency. They know what they need and want, If they are of good stock, they will withstand most problems on their own with minimal assistance from their neighborly beekeeper.
How do we treat our bees? Do we treat them like property, having no independence beyond our intentions or do we see them as capable living creatures that we can share a cooperative existence with?
Thursday, May 29, 2014
Bee Scientifically
Let's look up the definition of "Science" first, shall we? According to a Google search, the first result is this...
Depending on the type of scientist you describe, Merriam Webster says a scientist is essentially someone learned in science or a scientific investigator.
The ideal scientist is someone who is objective, they keep their mind open and flexible. They understand that science is ongoing and ever changing because the tools, technology and methods are always improving. Technology advances provide new evidence that couldn't be observed or measured before. A scientist is someone who recognizes that science is never settled, it is always subject to change because of technology and new evidence.
My site here and others I have respect for all deal with scientific beekeeping.
Scientific is defined as...
Ultimately, science is boiled down to the practice and pursuit of the scientific method.
A scientist is one who uses the scientific method to further knowledge of the world around them.
Yes, there are many scientists who are trained in a particular field of study and consequently are paid to pursue those studies on behalf of a company or university.
There are a lot of people who love to leave people thinking that a scientist is someone who gets paid to pursue a scientific study and possesses one or more academic degrees to validate that position.
I don't knock anyone who dedicates themselves to a field of scientific study and then is able to do that work for a living. I think it is admirable and it takes a lot of dedication and self discipline to accomplish such a task.
By the same token, I say that that person is not the only person who can truthfully be called a scientist. Money and the collection of academic degrees does not define the scientist.
In fact, many of the world's most noted scientific discoveries came not from educated scholars (though a great many have) but from laymen and those in religious orders who were inventors and observers of the natural world. People who wanted answers to the questions of "Why?" and "How?".
In fact, many of the most well known bee researchers and bee scientists were the latter types. Take Emile Warre was an Abbe ( a member of an Abbe or Monastory.), Lorenzo Langstroth was a Reverend. Huber was a noted theologian and Brother Adam a monk. Many and varied are the farmers, laymen and entrepreneurs who dedicated something of great value to the ongoing pursuit of knowledge of the honeybee.
Science today, in these modern times, can be quite contestable. What is released to the public with great fanfare one day, is refuted sometimes within days or weeks later after peer review of the methods and conditions said scientist used to reach their conclusions.
A great example of this is the recent and notable researcher, Dr. Lu, who had his work first praised in the mainstream media only to have his work turned on it's head by others in the bee research field who found egregious flaws in his methods and experimentation. Randy Oliver, another noted and respected bee researcher took this study to task and received quite a bit of negative attention because the topic is political hot potato involving crusading political activists, lethargic government entities and mutli-national corporations who stand to gain or lose billions of dollars by whether the research ultimately supports their claims or goes against them.
Professional scientists have to be accountable for the work they are paid to do. Their work is often the basis for industrialist corporations, governments and highly regarded universities to profit or gain from. They are under a lot of stress and pressure to come up with something that makes their employers or financiers look good. Professional scientists are only human after all. Despite the tendency of people wanting to elevate those in prestigious positions to a pedestal, professional scientists are fallible to the 7 deadly human sins as any person is.
They are susceptible to greed,sloth, lust, gluttony, wrath, envy and pride. A professional scientist is no better a person than an amateur scientist. They have access to money and better tools and equipment which enables them to do much more than many amateurs, but as a person, those things do nothing to distinguish them apart.
Ultimately, a scientist is a person. A person with all the traits, capabilities and vulnerabilities any person might have.
Science itself is a process of discovery. Observations are made, hypothesis are formed, tested and often are disproved. In this process, short amounts of time may pass or extremely long amounts of time may pass before new observations are made and new evidence is found. Sometimes this new evidence throws out what had bee thought long standing "proven" science and sometimes it upholds and confirms what was once thought to be something fantastic and out of left field.
One thing science never is is "settled". It may lay dormant for a great many years, growing fat on the beliefs of many who believe it to be the last word on a subject. It may never see the light of day longer than is needed to harpoon it immediately and send it to the depths of disproof.
Any scientist, professional or amateur who resists being questioned, their methods or their ideas, has lost sight of what science truly is and instead might be seen as a person who has become more concerned by the title of "scientist" and what it brings to them.
I would like to encourage all beekeepers, especially hobbyists, to be scientific beekeepers.
Educate yourself thoroughly about bee biology and behavior.
Observe and document as much as you can for each hive you keep.
Remember each colony is a little different, your actions with each hive might differ from the one next to it.
Don't be afraid to hypothesize about the health and needs of each hive. There are tests to determine if what you think is happening actually is.
The more you know, the better you bee.
the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behavior of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment.According to Google, a scientist is this...
a person who is studying or has expert knowledge of one or more of the natural or physical sciences.
Depending on the type of scientist you describe, Merriam Webster says a scientist is essentially someone learned in science or a scientific investigator.
The ideal scientist is someone who is objective, they keep their mind open and flexible. They understand that science is ongoing and ever changing because the tools, technology and methods are always improving. Technology advances provide new evidence that couldn't be observed or measured before. A scientist is someone who recognizes that science is never settled, it is always subject to change because of technology and new evidence.
My site here and others I have respect for all deal with scientific beekeeping.
Scientific is defined as...
based on or characterized by the methods and principles of science.
Ultimately, science is boiled down to the practice and pursuit of the scientific method.
principles and procedures for the systematic pursuit of knowledge involving the recognition and formulation of a problem, the collection of data through observation and experiment, and the formulation and testing of hypotheses
A scientist is one who uses the scientific method to further knowledge of the world around them.
Yes, there are many scientists who are trained in a particular field of study and consequently are paid to pursue those studies on behalf of a company or university.
There are a lot of people who love to leave people thinking that a scientist is someone who gets paid to pursue a scientific study and possesses one or more academic degrees to validate that position.
I don't knock anyone who dedicates themselves to a field of scientific study and then is able to do that work for a living. I think it is admirable and it takes a lot of dedication and self discipline to accomplish such a task.
By the same token, I say that that person is not the only person who can truthfully be called a scientist. Money and the collection of academic degrees does not define the scientist.
In fact, many of the world's most noted scientific discoveries came not from educated scholars (though a great many have) but from laymen and those in religious orders who were inventors and observers of the natural world. People who wanted answers to the questions of "Why?" and "How?".
In fact, many of the most well known bee researchers and bee scientists were the latter types. Take Emile Warre was an Abbe ( a member of an Abbe or Monastory.), Lorenzo Langstroth was a Reverend. Huber was a noted theologian and Brother Adam a monk. Many and varied are the farmers, laymen and entrepreneurs who dedicated something of great value to the ongoing pursuit of knowledge of the honeybee.
Science today, in these modern times, can be quite contestable. What is released to the public with great fanfare one day, is refuted sometimes within days or weeks later after peer review of the methods and conditions said scientist used to reach their conclusions.
A great example of this is the recent and notable researcher, Dr. Lu, who had his work first praised in the mainstream media only to have his work turned on it's head by others in the bee research field who found egregious flaws in his methods and experimentation. Randy Oliver, another noted and respected bee researcher took this study to task and received quite a bit of negative attention because the topic is political hot potato involving crusading political activists, lethargic government entities and mutli-national corporations who stand to gain or lose billions of dollars by whether the research ultimately supports their claims or goes against them.
Professional scientists have to be accountable for the work they are paid to do. Their work is often the basis for industrialist corporations, governments and highly regarded universities to profit or gain from. They are under a lot of stress and pressure to come up with something that makes their employers or financiers look good. Professional scientists are only human after all. Despite the tendency of people wanting to elevate those in prestigious positions to a pedestal, professional scientists are fallible to the 7 deadly human sins as any person is.
They are susceptible to greed,sloth, lust, gluttony, wrath, envy and pride. A professional scientist is no better a person than an amateur scientist. They have access to money and better tools and equipment which enables them to do much more than many amateurs, but as a person, those things do nothing to distinguish them apart.
Ultimately, a scientist is a person. A person with all the traits, capabilities and vulnerabilities any person might have.
Science itself is a process of discovery. Observations are made, hypothesis are formed, tested and often are disproved. In this process, short amounts of time may pass or extremely long amounts of time may pass before new observations are made and new evidence is found. Sometimes this new evidence throws out what had bee thought long standing "proven" science and sometimes it upholds and confirms what was once thought to be something fantastic and out of left field.
One thing science never is is "settled". It may lay dormant for a great many years, growing fat on the beliefs of many who believe it to be the last word on a subject. It may never see the light of day longer than is needed to harpoon it immediately and send it to the depths of disproof.
Any scientist, professional or amateur who resists being questioned, their methods or their ideas, has lost sight of what science truly is and instead might be seen as a person who has become more concerned by the title of "scientist" and what it brings to them.
I would like to encourage all beekeepers, especially hobbyists, to be scientific beekeepers.
Educate yourself thoroughly about bee biology and behavior.
Observe and document as much as you can for each hive you keep.
Remember each colony is a little different, your actions with each hive might differ from the one next to it.
Don't be afraid to hypothesize about the health and needs of each hive. There are tests to determine if what you think is happening actually is.
The more you know, the better you bee.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)